The change bag Amores Perros
I'm still not very convinced of change, but the house's Book promoting their blogs, and decided to move the backpack, semi loaded with books (I've had more left than that), or half-empty, as you want to see, Arena's book, the literary blogging community in this mega bookstore.
I'm not convinced because I do not know yet if you can get a lot of changes, like putting the clock in Pamplona and Juarez, literary quotes and add the books I'm reading and which I purchased last, as it I have the original, but little by little we will see such results. As soon notice that I'm moving partition by partition, so here is the link though, will find for now only the first text that was in the original bag. Only patience and ask them to visit it occasionally to see if I've added something new.
http://www.librodearena.com/elmorraldelamagga
Wednesday, September 27, 2006
Thursday, September 14, 2006
Laser Sailboat Blueprint
address
HCE thousands of years, man has discovered an animal that had surprised him as an organizational system very similar to human societies. This animal, the wolf, could be very useful to man, both in how they live with the rest of wolves, as in his way of hunting, foraging, saving, and more. No one knows quite how, but this animal pups went to a tribe, and found that children adapted quickly. So these puppies grew along with the children of the tribe, and from there was born a hybrid society, a society in which the animal and the man were together and complemented each other. Over the years, it was discovered that besides being useful at home and with children, animals, and domesticated and even now with the name of dog that we know today, could also, through an intense training be useful and specialize in many other tasks. So the man subjected to this training and it helped, thanks to genetics, to develop more each skill that the dog showing, so the race came, the work of man and selection breeding of individuals that have better developed the skill. The first domestic dogs, therefore, had very specific jobs, whether for grazing, hunting or guardians of the tribe. But above all and from the beginning, the main activity of the dog was to accompany the man. Therefore it is said that man's best friend is the dog (upside down, not so much) since it has always accompanied faithfully. In his book
Observe your dog, Desmond Morris says, and perhaps rightly, that the contract signed by dogs and men many years ago, 99 percent of the time is broken by man. We all know that some dogs, apparently for no reason, attack the people. In the word "apparently" lies the mystery but the answer usually attack dogs always have some reason to do so, but we men, we are unable to discover what it is. Backwards, as I said, not so much. Sometimes dogs attack man, and is much more difficult to find a real reason.
I know people who do not like dogs. One which just happens to them. And everyone has their reasons, or not to do and I understand. Those who have no reason, according to the way I see it is those who abuse and assault. These people and I remain suspicious even in the deal to other people. I find it easy to imagine the person who hits, abuses or abandons a dog, those torturers of animals, bullying his family, skipping the traffic laws, and being cruel to their peers, even those who want. It is these people who do not understand. Because not everyone has to like a dog or a cat, but not like to leave it tied to a tree to die of hunger and I eat the bugs, there is a yawning chasm.
HCE thousands of years, man has discovered an animal that had surprised him as an organizational system very similar to human societies. This animal, the wolf, could be very useful to man, both in how they live with the rest of wolves, as in his way of hunting, foraging, saving, and more. No one knows quite how, but this animal pups went to a tribe, and found that children adapted quickly. So these puppies grew along with the children of the tribe, and from there was born a hybrid society, a society in which the animal and the man were together and complemented each other. Over the years, it was discovered that besides being useful at home and with children, animals, and domesticated and even now with the name of dog that we know today, could also, through an intense training be useful and specialize in many other tasks. So the man subjected to this training and it helped, thanks to genetics, to develop more each skill that the dog showing, so the race came, the work of man and selection breeding of individuals that have better developed the skill. The first domestic dogs, therefore, had very specific jobs, whether for grazing, hunting or guardians of the tribe. But above all and from the beginning, the main activity of the dog was to accompany the man. Therefore it is said that man's best friend is the dog (upside down, not so much) since it has always accompanied faithfully. In his book
Observe your dog, Desmond Morris says, and perhaps rightly, that the contract signed by dogs and men many years ago, 99 percent of the time is broken by man. We all know that some dogs, apparently for no reason, attack the people. In the word "apparently" lies the mystery but the answer usually attack dogs always have some reason to do so, but we men, we are unable to discover what it is. Backwards, as I said, not so much. Sometimes dogs attack man, and is much more difficult to find a real reason.
I know people who do not like dogs. One which just happens to them. And everyone has their reasons, or not to do and I understand. Those who have no reason, according to the way I see it is those who abuse and assault. These people and I remain suspicious even in the deal to other people. I find it easy to imagine the person who hits, abuses or abandons a dog, those torturers of animals, bullying his family, skipping the traffic laws, and being cruel to their peers, even those who want. It is these people who do not understand. Because not everyone has to like a dog or a cat, but not like to leave it tied to a tree to die of hunger and I eat the bugs, there is a yawning chasm.
several days ago he wanted to write about it, first because I read the book by Desmond Morris, and then because I had the occurrence of me around the site of the Humane Society, the place where it came Bioy. There's horror stories of abuse and neglect of dogs and what continues to impress even more is the attitude of the dogs, always faithful and loving even with his tormentor. I read, for example, the story of a dog that its owner left it was going to live in France. The dog does not want to leave the house, still there, waiting for his master. Have tried to take him to a shelter, some people it takes to eat, but the dog does not eat, just wait. Or the history that happened in the past Easter holiday, in which a family returning from vacation crashed and died. The dog, who was in the car, waited for their masters, they never return. No one noticed He and the dog walked back to his house and sat back to wait. And it is that dogs are not only taught to those men, our ancestors, a useful form of organization within the meaning of hunting and getting food, but also a way to coexist with others on the basis of solidarity and affection. Wolves are known, for example, help females to feed the puppies, or their caregivers while the female goes in search of food. Whole herd, not just the father, takes charge of small members. These examples are much more human than some in which the protagonists are we men.
And as a person mistreat or torture or abandons an animal, I find it really suspicious about his dealings with humans, so sometimes I've caught being prejudiced to people to discover their humanity through their dealings with animals. One day I hopped in a taxi, I think the English Hospital in Ave National Army, to the Angeles del Pedregal. For some reason I had to go by taxi, a hurry to arrive, and though I usually get on site taxis and the driver noticing, this time without noticing I got a lot, and get on I discovered a man with a pint of offender I really cared. I even thought about telling my descent was before, and so take another taxi. Those who Mexico City know understand why so much distrust. The fact is that we were going down the highway, when at the height of constituents, the traffic had stopped. What was our surprise to discover the cause: in the fast lane, a kitten was scared stiff, unable to go forward or backward. The cars all they could do was get around it, but it was a matter of minutes that the cat died between the wheels of any less cautious or less sympathetic. So my taxi driver stopped in the middle peripheral put flashing lights, got out of the car, picked her up the kitten and began to stop traffic to cross the two lane and the lane missing lateral up to the sidewalk. There, he walked a few steps, until you see the cat does not recede back to the street and placed it gently on a planter. Returning, the man almost cried, said he could not let it die. The rest of the way we did the two to tears, as I told the story of her son, who was sick a long time, I think for a motorcycle accident in the hospital and next was another man with his son, also very serious. I think in the end the son of one of the two men no longer remember which one died, and I do not remember having to do this story with the cat, but had something to do, I say.
It took several days to decide to write all this, I already had planned, but yesterday came the news on television that perplexed us: in 2004, a veterinarian Aguiño, the town where we went on vacation, in Galicia, filmed a neighbor who beat him to a dog. It was claimed as evidence, the man was sentenced to pay a fine for animal abuse, because apparently that was not the only dog \u200b\u200bthat was abused. The scenes are terrible, the man beating the dog with a tube and the dog, a huge German shepherd, does not make any hint of defense or attack, just crying to the rain that falls on sticks. The veterinarian has become to sue this man, because now makes life impossible, he sprayed petrol her house and poisoned a dog. What is surprising in the case, and why the news came out yesterday is that the townspeople of Aguiño not only defends the ancien abuser, but also applauded him while the vet had to leave, escorted by the police for amount of boos and threats from neighbors. The old man says they are all lies, where we can all see in the video hitting the dog. After seeing that, it begins to fail to amaze me that there are people who burn the hills of Galicia. Are the same as hitting the dogs, or at least, are of the same ilk.
Monday, September 4, 2006
Katydids By Kathryn Beich
Fight Captain giant
about a year ago we expected this time. Over the past weeks, and were bombarded by advertising, interviews, articles and trailer that reminded us that soon we could see, at last, Captain Alatriste. Thanks to the enthusiasm that Perez Reverte himself put on the characterization of Viggo Mortensen as the captain, and photos, we knew that at least the protagonist does not disappoint us. The writer told that the only condition that put Diaz Yanes was that their beloved master were like us, the readers, and as he himself reading his adventures we imagined. Yañez Díaz not only kept his promise, but all players have exceeded expectations. The seventeenth century English as we assume it was: Dark, decadent, violent. An empire on the verge of collapse still spends his remaining strength to keep the domain and the power he wields in the world. The fight will last for two centuries until the end of 19 when Cuba is the last brick to fall.
rarely in Spain has put so much on the grill for a movie: an investment of 24 million euros, an illusion, a script that attempts to summarize a great saga of adventure, not just the recreation of an era but an entire worldview. The accounts appear leaving, for now, in the black. A million spectators have seen Alatriste in the first weekend, and as consideration Perez Reverte, he is satisfied with the results and the actors were crying when the lights of the cinema the night of his first screening.
Alatriste is one of my favorite characters, and the truth is that Viggo is the best captain who might have known. There are countless stories of the extraordinary efforts made by the actor for his performance. Castilla was kicked around looking for the ideal place where he may have born the captain, (information that novels do not reveal) are not only memorized the script, as is their job, but also the complete saga, almost made the Prado museum home, again and again studying the paintings of Velázquez. And the end result is that it humanized the captain. Diego Alatriste ("was not the best or the most pious, but it was a brave man," the phrase that begins the first novel and has been taken as the slogan of the film) is a bit more cynical about the novel. Gestures, Viggo deep blue eyes, her tears, her walk, her gestures, give a cockiness but also an awareness of always being a defeated man ("be with those boots are a sign of pride, or lack of money, captain? "asked the Count-Duke of Olivares," both things, His Excellency, "replied Diego.) Actually, I remembered the captain as a hero in the novel, when in reality it is a poor man immersed in his violent and bloody times to the head. A hit man for bad life, but a generous man, deeply loyal. And sometimes those details that I missed (or I 0lvidaron) in the novel, Viggo are impossible to forget, remember them with every step or every gesture. Not only is impeccable in its Viggo performance, but most of the performances are deeply moving: Juan Echanove as Quevedo, Eduard Fernandez and Sebastian, Eduardo Noriega as the Count of Guadalmedina (I confess I was surprised, not between my favorite actors) are the ones I liked. But Walter Malatesta also seems straight out of the novel and Javier Camara as the Conde Duque de Olivares is also impressive, and Ariadna Gil pride. Up to three sentences of Pilar Lopez de Ayala makes their tiny share a great contribution. And Unax Ugalde is my favorite young actor, so I was delighted when I knew it would Iñigo Balboa. The only I did not like, and it's not their fault, but the amendment that made his character was Alquézar Angelica, played by Elena Anaya. For starters, Angelica Alquézar was blond and blue eyes, and it is minor is a lesser evil. The Worse was the terrible evil, a demon disguised as an angel, a manipulative interested. It was intriguing and cool. And in the film was as a girl in love who is carried away by circumstances, by the opportunities presented, giving love almost an obligation to class otherwise. And that, to lie, it smacks off the subject. Because the novel was always good to imagine now that mischief was going to leave the evil Angélica the innocent Iñigo.
Another thing I liked, but we have already said much Carlos and me is that the film has a story around, but rather, out of the novels the "high lights" with a storyline that connects them. This is enough to Alatriste geeks like us who know the context and everything that happens before and after each adventure, but I think that a viewer who has not read any novels are left with a narrative void. Narrative is where I see the weakness and strong point is definitely plastic, visual, but the movie sometimes seems a succession of moving pictures by Velazquez: the same light, the same contrasts. It has a precious picture, a dark setting as the time, a stark reality and real life from that moment, but maybe for a "not started" that is not enough. We will have to ask.
Some pages to start:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)